A nice cat lady (man? don’t assume gender?!?) on twitter kindly provided a scale for us to determine how racist we are:
(h/t RadicalCatholic on Gab)
As things now often go on the internet, this backfired and trolls popped up immediately, bragging about how racist they are.
Overt racism, second from the left
I was only at “whites are being persecuted” but I searched my Reiver soul and knew that deep in my heart, Whites are the Superior Race.
This scale doesn’t go far enough to the left for me
Where’s the “Non-whites are subhuman and we’re not really sure about the Irish” tick on the left?
Uhh, did you know that linear graph logic is in fact highly oppressive and rooted in Western dominance hierarchies? Racist and sexist much?
Is there more to this scale? Like another page to the left? I can’t find myself on here.
What more can we say? CNN, the viewers may be smarter than you think.
A series of fake news articles (see here, here and here), black mail of anonymous Reddit users who had the audacity to poke fun at them and a couple of undercover videos from Project Veritas revealing CNN producers admitting their own news is “mostly bullshit,” seems to be taking a toll on CNN’s ratings.
As The Federalist notes in the table below, for the week of June 26th – July 2nd, CNN’s primetime shows (Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon) managed to draw about 6% fewer viewers than multi-decade old re-runs of “Yogi Bear,” “Full House,” and “Friends” which air in the same time slots on Nick-At-Nite.
Sometimes it’s difficult to know for sure, but we think this is a bad trend…
The start of the Next Great Meme War; this is only the beginning, only the “fun stuff.” I wouldn’t want to be a CNN executive right now, or honestly anyone affiliated with them.
Something just for fun…
Answer: We’ll just do it ourselves.
The internet, even with all its downsides, has certainly done some interesting things for the way “normal” folks can do awesome things. Are the authorities not doing their duty in investigating a (potential) murder case? Covering things up are they? Media not doing their jobs to honestly report facts and relevant current events? No worries. The centipedes and /pol/ are on top of things.
Just a couple examples from today.
On the Donald this morning, they were talking about Wikileaks’ twitter announcement: BREAKING: Sweden has dropped its case against Julian Assange and will revoke its arrest warrant
So now does Mr. Assange just need a pardon from Trump and he’ll actually get to leave the Embassy? Some pedes seem to think leaving may be too dangerous for Assange even if that were possible, and that maybe it’s just a trap. I almost wouldn’t put it past the pedes and/or /pol/ to somehow break Assange out of the Embassy and have him whisked away to some safe and undisclosed location.
Google, of course, failed me for any further information. If you want truly breaking news, skip the news outlets, just go to the citizen investigators of the internet.
In other news, the centipedes and /pol/ are busy working to collect, archive and sift through every trace of Seth Rich on the internet (just one of many threads with them hard at work). They’re analyzing his entire life and personality and picking out anything that would lead to confirmation that he was the source of the DNC leaks and was murdered for it. As the circumstantial evidence amasses, it becomes increasingly easy to believe this “internet conspiracy theory.”
If it’s the so-called “unbiased media” and government officials — who we should supposedly be trusting over “weirdos” on the internet — who keep dishing out falsehoods and fake news, what are we supposed to think when the so-called “internet conspiracy theories” keep turning out to be true these days. I’m not sure there is anything too weird and convoluted to believe, especially when it comes to politics.
The Regressive Left is at it again: trying to squelch free speech. Do they ever stop? They’re probably working around the clock to shut up everyone who disagrees. Who’d have thought we’d be rooting for the trolls over “polite society”? We’ll take the internet’s free — even though sometimes “impolite” or even downright nasty — speech over a sanitized, leftist-policed version — if that’s what we wanted, we’d just watch the MSM exclusively. Thinking people can sift through the internet’s chafe to get to the wheat. We’re not interested in having predigested propaganda served up to us. It’s not surprising that the Media are the first ones calling this developing tech a good thing.
Have these people never seen/read any dystopian stories where an A.I.is developed to control people in some way? Yeah, that always ends well. Any time humans try to forcefully create Utopia by taking away the freedom of others, people suffer greatly. Even in the novel from which the term is taken, it quickly becomes apparent that Utopia is really what we’d call today a dystopian society.
Here’s hoping that if this thing ever gets off the ground there will be ways around it and/or a legion of hackers to destroy it. War on Comments: Google Built an A.I. to Censor the Web, And the Media Is Celebrating:
“What if technology could help improve conversations online?”
That’s the lowkey Orwellian message that greets visitors to the website of Perspective, Google’s new AI system for detecting (and potentially deleting, hiding, or burying) “toxic” comments on the web.
Perspective is still in early days of development, but in the future, you may have to adjust your speech in order to satisfy the lofty standards of Google. Otherwise, the company’s faceless AI might just have to “improve” you. Where’s Sarah Connor when you need her?
The good news is that, for now at least, Perspective is about as effective as C-3PO with a lisp. Software engineer and columnist David Auerbach has found the program woefully inept at sorting “toxic” comments from ordinary ones. Because the AI currently focuses on words rather than meanings, inoffensive comments like, “Rape is a horrible crime,” or, “few Muslims are a terrorist threat,” were assigned “toxicity” ratings of over 75 percent.
Of course, even if Perspective could successfully sort “toxic” comments from innocuous ones, that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re going to be deleted or buried. According to the project’s homepage, the system performs no function other than detection.
But statements from the project’s developers make it clear that censorship is the end goal. Indeed, the system seems to have been developed to augment the left’s ongoing war on comments sections. The software was initially made available just to organizations that are part of Google’s Digital News Initiative, including the BBC, The Financial Times, and The Guardian, which promptly began testing the software to moderate their comments sections.
“News organizations want to encourage engagement and discussion around their content, but find that sorting through millions of comments to find those that are trolling or abusive takes a lot of money, labour and time,” says Jared Cohen, president of Jigsaw, the Google social incubator that built the tool. “As a result, many sites have shut down comments altogether. But they tell us that isn’t the solution they want.”
Google couldn’t be clearer: it’s a censorship bot. And just because it’s currently limited to news sites and comments sections doesn’t mean it won’t be rolled out to social networks and the rest of the web. Twitter, which just introduced yet another system to punish users who hurt celebrities’ feelings, would probably love to get their hands on a working version of Perspective.
Twitter already has a tremendous depth of data on its users, including gender, location, and personal interests. Imagine that data, combined with an AI tool designed to pinpoint inconvenient content, in the hands of a CEO who has done little to conceal his political biases.
The idea of an all-powerful Google robot watching over us all, making sure our speech is “improved,” has greatly excited mainstream media…